Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM

AMD Radeon Pro W6800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6800 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6800 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 93% (2320MHz vs 1203MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6800 +623%
17.82 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 950 OEM
2.464 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2021
Release Date
Jan 2016
Radeon Pro
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2075 MHz
Base Clock
937 MHz
2320 MHz
Boost Clock
1203 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
60
Compute Units
-
3840
Shading Units
1024
240
TMUs
64
96
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
60
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

222.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.50 GPixel/s
556.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.99 GTexel/s
35.64 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
17.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.464 TFLOPS
1114 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
76.99 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
GM206S
-
GPU Variant
950 OEM
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
Unknown
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
6.5
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy