AMD Radeon Pro W6300M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6300M and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Pro W6300M 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 40% (2040MHz vs 1455MHz)
Lower TDP (25W vs 35W)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6300M
3.133 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation
+185%
8.94 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Mar 2023
Radeon Pro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1512 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
2040 MHz
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
32bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
768
Shading Units
3072
48
TMUs
96
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
12
RT Cores
24
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
8 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
65.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
69.84 GPixel/s
97.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
139.7 GTexel/s
6.267 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.940 TFLOPS
3.133 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.940 TFLOPS
195.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
139.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Navi 24
GPU Name
AD107
Navi 24
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
5 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.7
Shader Model
6.7
