AMD Radeon Pro W6300M vs NVIDIA NVS 2100M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6300M and 512MB VRAM NVS 2100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Pro W6300M 's Advantages
Released 12 years late
Boost Clock2040MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
752 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 2100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (11W vs 25W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6300M
+7933%
3.133 TFLOPS
NVS 2100M
0.039 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Jan 2010
Radeon Pro Mobile
Generation
NVS Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1512 MHz
Base Clock
-
2040 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
32bit
Memory Bus
64bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s
Render Config
12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
768
Shading Units
16
48
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
8 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
65.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.140 GPixel/s
97.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.280 GTexel/s
6.267 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.133 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
195.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
25W
TDP
11W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Navi 24
GPU Name
GT218
Navi 24
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.7
Shader Model
4.1
