Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6300M vs AMD FirePro M3900

AMD Radeon Pro W6300M vs AMD FirePro M3900

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6300M and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6300M 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2040MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
608 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 25W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6300M +1205%
3.133 TFLOPS
FirePro M3900
0.24 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Oct 2010
Radeon Pro Mobile
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1512 MHz
Base Clock
-
2040 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
32bit
Memory Bus
64bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
2
768
Shading Units
160
48
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

65.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.000 GPixel/s
97.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.000 GTexel/s
6.267 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.133 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
195.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
Seymour
Navi 24
GPU Variant
Seymour GL
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
0.37 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Board Design

25W
TDP
20W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy