AMD Radeon Pro VII vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro VII and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Pro VII 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1020GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
3600 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (204W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro VII
+1744%
13.06 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
0.708 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2020
Release Date
Jan 2009
Radeon Pro Vega
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1400 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1242 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
512bit
1020GB/s
Bandwidth
159.0GB/s
Render Config
60
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
3840
Shading Units
240
240
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
108.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.74 GPixel/s
408.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
26.11 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
708.5 GFLOPS
6.528 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
88.56 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
204W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Vega 20
GPU Name
GT200B
Vega 20 GLXT WS
(215-0914026)
GPU Variant
G200-350-B3
GCN 5.1
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
55 nm
13.23 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
331 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
