Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X vs AMD Radeon E9171 MCM

AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X vs AMD Radeon E9171 MCM

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega 64X and 4GB VRAM Radeon E9171 MCM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 20% (1468MHz vs 1219MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon E9171 MCM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Vega 64X +863%
12.03 TFLOPS
Radeon E9171 MCM
1.248 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2019
Release Date
Oct 2017
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1250 MHz
Base Clock
1124 MHz
1468 MHz
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
2048bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
64
Compute Units
8
4096
Shading Units
512
256
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

93.95 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
375.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
24.05 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
12.03 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
751.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
Lexa
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
GPU Variant
Lexa MCM Pro
GCN 5.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
14 nm
Process Size
14 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
40W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy