Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro V320 vs NVIDIA A16 PCIe

AMD Radeon Pro V320 vs NVIDIA A16 PCIe

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V320 and 16GB VRAM A16 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro V320 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 231.9GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (230W vs 250W)
NVIDIA A16 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 13% (1695MHz vs 1500MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro V320 +147%
10.75 TFLOPS
A16 PCIe
4.339 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Apr 2021
Radeon Pro Vega
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

852 MHz
Base Clock
885 MHz
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
1695 MHz
945 MHz
Memory Clock
1812 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR6
2048bit
Memory Bus
128bit
483.8GB/s
Bandwidth
231.9GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
10
56
Compute Units
-
3584
Shading Units
1280
224
TMUs
40
64
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
40
-
RT Cores
10
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

96.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.24 GPixel/s
336.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.80 GTexel/s
21.50 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.339 TFLOPS
10.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.339 TFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
135.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
GA107
Vega 10 XL GL SERVER (215-0894144)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 5.0
Architecture
Ampere
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
Samsung
14 nm
Process Size
8 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
Unknown
495 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

230W
TDP
250W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.7
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy