AMD Radeon Pro SSG vs Moore Threads MTT S2000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro SSG and 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Pro SSG 's Advantages
Boost Clock1500MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 16GB)
Lower TDP (150W vs 260W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro SSG
+15%
12.29 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S2000
10.65 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2017
Release Date
Unknown
Radeon Pro
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1440 MHz
Base Clock
1300 MHz
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
945 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
32GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR6
2048bit
Memory Bus
256bit
483.8GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
64
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
4096
256
TMUs
256
64
ROPs
256
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
96.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
332.8 GPixel/s
384.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
332.8 GTexel/s
24.58 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
21.30 TFLOPS
12.29 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.65 TFLOPS
768.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
166.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
260W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Vega 10
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
Vega 10 XT GL
(215-0894124)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 5.0
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
12 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
Unknown
495 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.4
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5
