AMD Radeon Pro SSG vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro SSG and 1536MB VRAM GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Pro SSG 's Advantages
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 134.4GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (260W vs 375W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro SSG
+1040%
12.29 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 480 Core 512
1.078 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2017
Release Date
Unknown
Radeon Pro
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1440 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
945 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1536MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
2048bit
Memory Bus
384bit
483.8GB/s
Bandwidth
134.4GB/s
Render Config
64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
4096
Shading Units
512
256
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
96.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.86 GPixel/s
384.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.73 GTexel/s
24.58 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.29 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1078 GFLOPS
768.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
260W
TDP
375W
600 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Vega 10
GPU Name
GF100
Vega 10 XT GL
(215-0894124)
GPU Variant
GF100-ES-DT1-A2
GCN 5.0
Architecture
Fermi
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
