AMD Radeon Pro SSG vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro SSG and 256MB VRAM GeForce 8400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Pro SSG 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
4088 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 260W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro SSG
+58423%
12.29 TFLOPS
GeForce 8400
0.021 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2017
Release Date
Dec 2007
Radeon Pro
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1440 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
945 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM2
Memory Type
DDR2
2048bit
Memory Bus
64bit
483.8GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s
Render Config
64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
4096
Shading Units
8
256
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
96.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.160 GPixel/s
384.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.160 GTexel/s
24.58 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.29 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.80 GFLOPS
768.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
260W
TDP
25W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Vega 10
GPU Name
G98
Vega 10 XT GL
(215-0894124)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 5.0
Architecture
Tesla
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
65 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
