AMD Radeon Pro SSG vs NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro SSG and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 510 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Pro SSG 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 14.37GB/s)
4048 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 260W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro SSG
+12190%
12.29 TFLOPS
GeForce 510 OEM
0.1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2017
Release Date
Sep 2011
Radeon Pro
Generation
GeForce 500
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1440 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
945 MHz
Memory Clock
898 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2
Memory Type
DDR3
2048bit
Memory Bus
64bit
483.8GB/s
Bandwidth
14.37GB/s
Render Config
64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
4096
Shading Units
48
256
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
96.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
384.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
24.58 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.29 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
768.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS
Board Design
260W
TDP
25W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x VGA
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Vega 10
GPU Name
GF119
Vega 10 XT GL
(215-0894124)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 5.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
