Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs ATI FirePro V7900 SDI

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs ATI FirePro V7900 SDI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 SDI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V7900 SDI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris +208%
5.728 TFLOPS
FirePro V7900 SDI
1.856 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2017
Release Date
May 2011
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
36
Compute Units
20
2304
Shading Units
1280
144
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.00 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.856 TFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
464.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
Cayman
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO GL
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x SDI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy