AMD Radeon Instinct MI60 vs NVIDIA GRID K260Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI60 and 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Instinct MI60 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1800MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1024GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID K260Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI60
+544%
14.75 TFLOPS
GRID K260Q
2.289 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2018
Release Date
Jun 2013
Radeon Instinct
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1200 MHz
Base Clock
-
1800 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
32GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1024GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
64
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
1536
256
TMUs
128
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
460.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
7.373 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
225W
700 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Vega 20
GPU Name
GK104
Vega 20 GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 5.1
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
13.23 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
331 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
