AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X vs Moore Threads MTT S3000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 288GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI325X and 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S3000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X 's Advantages
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (288GB vs 32GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
15360 additional rendering cores
Moore Threads MTT S3000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (250W vs 1000W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI325X
+425%
81.72 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S3000
15.56 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2024
Release Date
Unknown
Radeon Instinct
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
1900 MHz
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
0 MHz
2525 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
288GB
Memory Size
32GB
HBM3e
Memory Type
GDDR6
8192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
10.3TB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
304
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
19456
Shading Units
4096
1216
TMUs
256
0
ROPs
256
1216
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
256 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
486.4 GPixel/s
2553.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
486.4 GTexel/s
653.7 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
31.13 TFLOPS
81.72 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.56 TFLOPS
81.72 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
1000W
TDP
250W
1400 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Aqua Vanjaram
GPU Name
MTT Gen 2
-
-
-
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
12 nm
153 billion
Transistors
22 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.4
-
-
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.5
