AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X vs Intel Arc Pro A50
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 288GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI325X and 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A50 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (288GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
18432 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc Pro A50 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 12% (2350MHz vs 2100MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 1000W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI325X
+1597%
81.72 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A50
4.813 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2024
Release Date
Aug 2022
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
2000 MHz
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
2350 MHz
2525 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
288GB
Memory Size
6GB
HBM3e
Memory Type
GDDR6
8192bit
Memory Bus
96bit
10.3TB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
304
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
19456
Shading Units
1024
1216
TMUs
64
0
ROPs
32
1216
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
8
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
256 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.20 GPixel/s
2553.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.4 GTexel/s
653.7 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
9.626 TFLOPS
81.72 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.813 TFLOPS
81.72 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1203 GFLOPS
Board Design
1000W
TDP
75W
1400 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Aqua Vanjaram
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
6 nm
153 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.6
