AMD Radeon Instinct MI300A vs Moore Threads MTT S4000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 192GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI300A and 48GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Instinct MI300A 's Advantages
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 48GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 768.0GB/s)
11264 additional rendering cores
Moore Threads MTT S4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (450W vs 750W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI300A
+232%
81.72 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S4000
24.58 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2023
Release Date
Unknown
Radeon Instinct
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
1500 MHz
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2525 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
192GB
Memory Size
48GB
HBM3
Memory Type
GDDR6
8192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
10.3TB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s
Render Config
304
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
19456
Shading Units
8192
1216
TMUs
512
0
ROPs
512
1216
Tensor Cores
128
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
256 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
768.0 GPixel/s
2554 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
768.0 GTexel/s
653.7 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
49.15 TFLOPS
81.72 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
24.58 TFLOPS
81.72 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
384.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
750W
TDP
450W
1150 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Aqua Vanjaram
GPU Name
MTT Gen 2
-
-
-
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
12 nm
153 billion
Transistors
22 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.4
-
-
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.5
