Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000 SDI

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000 SDI

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250X and 12GB VRAM Quadro K6000 SDI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 12GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 288.4GB/s)
11200 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K6000 SDI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (239W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250X +821%
47.87 TFLOPS
Quadro K6000 SDI
5.196 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Jul 2013
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
12GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
220
Compute Units
-
14080
Shading Units
2880
880
TMUs
240
0
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.12 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.5 GTexel/s
383.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
47.87 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.196 TFLOPS
47.87 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.732 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Aldebaran
GPU Name
GK110
Aldebaran XT
GPU Variant
-
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
Unknown
Die Size
561 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
239W
900 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
3x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2 3x SDI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy