Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250X and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 370 LP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock1700MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
14072 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250X +281488%
47.87 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 370 LP
0.017 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Nov 2008
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
DDR2
8192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
1
220
Compute Units
-
14080
Shading Units
8
880
TMUs
4
0
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.160 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.160 GTexel/s
383.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
47.87 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.28 GFLOPS
47.87 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Aldebaran
GPU Name
G98
Aldebaran XT
GPU Variant
-
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
65 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
Unknown
Die Size
86 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
25W
900 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DMS-59
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
N/A
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy