Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216

AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 64GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI210 and 32GB VRAM Tesla PG503 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 11% (1700MHz vs 1530MHz)
More VRAM (64GB vs 32GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1638GB/s vs 1133GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 's Advantages
Lower TDP (250W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI210 +44%
22.63 TFLOPS
Tesla PG503 216
15.67 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2021
Release Date
Nov 2019
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
1312 MHz
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
1530 MHz
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
1106 MHz

Memory

64GB
Memory Size
32GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
HBM2
4096bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
1638GB/s
Bandwidth
1133GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
80
104
Compute Units
-
6656
Shading Units
5120
416
TMUs
320
0
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
195.8 GPixel/s
707.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
489.6 GTexel/s
181.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
31.33 TFLOPS
22.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.67 TFLOPS
22.63 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.834 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Aldebaran
GPU Name
GV100
Aldebaran
GPU Variant
-
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
12 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
Unknown
Die Size
815 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
250W
700 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.0
N/A
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy