AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 64GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI210 and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 5% (1700MHz vs 1620MHz)
More VRAM (64GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1638GB/s vs 112.1GB/s)
5632 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI210
+582%
22.63 TFLOPS
Quadro T2000 Max Q
3.318 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2021
Release Date
May 2019
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
1200 MHz
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
1620 MHz
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
1751 MHz
Memory
64GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1638GB/s
Bandwidth
112.1GB/s
Render Config
104
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
6656
Shading Units
1024
416
TMUs
64
0
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
51.84 GPixel/s
707.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.7 GTexel/s
181.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.636 TFLOPS
22.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.318 TFLOPS
22.63 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
40W
700 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Aldebaran
GPU Name
TU117
Aldebaran
GPU Variant
-
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
12 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
Unknown
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
N/A
Shader Model
6.6
