AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 64GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI210 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (64GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1638GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
6272 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI210
+3856%
22.63 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2021
Release Date
Jun 2012
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
64GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
DDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1638GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
104
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
6656
Shading Units
384
416
TMUs
32
0
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.960 GPixel/s
707.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.84 GTexel/s
181.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
572.2 GFLOPS
22.63 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
23.84 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
55W
700 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Aldebaran
GPU Name
GK107
Aldebaran
GPU Variant
N14P-Q3-A2
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
Unknown
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1
