AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 vs NVIDIA GRID M40
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 64GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI210 and 8GB VRAM GRID M40 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (64GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1638GB/s vs 83.20GB/s)
6272 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID M40 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI210
+2753%
22.63 TFLOPS
GRID M40
0.793 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2021
Release Date
May 2016
Radeon Instinct
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz
Memory
64GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1638GB/s
Bandwidth
83.20GB/s
Render Config
104
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
6656
Shading Units
384
416
TMUs
32
0
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.53 GPixel/s
707.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.06 GTexel/s
181.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
793.3 GFLOPS
22.63 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
24.79 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
50W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Aldebaran
GPU Name
GM107
Aldebaran
GPU Variant
-
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
Unknown
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1
