ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (25.60GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
80 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
Lower TDP (32W vs 45W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
+425%
0.168 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
0.032 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2008
Release Date
Jan 2009
Radeon R600
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
40
8
TMUs
4
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
5.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
-
-
-
168.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
45W
TDP
32W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x VHDCI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
RV620
-
GPU Variant
RC620 PRO
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1
