Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce 320M

AMD Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce 320M

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile and 0System Shared VRAM GeForce 320M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
464 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 320M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 45W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile +2150%
2.048 TFLOPS
GeForce 320M
0.091 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Apr 2010
Vega II IGP
Generation
GeForce 300M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
IGP
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

300 MHz
Base Clock
-
2000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

-
SM Count
4
8
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
48
32
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

16.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
64.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
4.096 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.048 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.20 GFLOPS
128.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Barcelo
GPU Name
C89
-
GPU Variant
MCP89-EPT
GCN 5.1
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
-
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
10.7 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
180 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Board Design

45W
TDP
23W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy