AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP vs AMD FirePro A320
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Radeon Graphics 384SP and 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A320 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 57% (1500MHz vs 955MHz)
Lower TDP (15W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Graphics 384SP
+57%
1.152 TFLOPS
FirePro A320
0.733 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2020
Release Date
Jun 2012
Renoir
Generation
Trinity
Integrated
Type
Integrated
IGP
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
400 MHz
Base Clock
800 MHz
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
955 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
6
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
384
24
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.640 GPixel/s
36.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.92 GTexel/s
2.304 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1152 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
733.4 GFLOPS
72.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
15W
TDP
100W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Renoir
GPU Name
Devastator
-
GPU Variant
A320
GCN 5.1
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
32 nm
9.8 billion
Transistors
1.303 billion
156 mm²
Die Size
246 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0
