AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM and 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon E9550 MXM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (95W vs 100W)
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 22% (1545MHz vs 1266MHz)
More VRAM (12GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon E9550 MXM
5.834 TFLOPS
RTX 3500 Mobile Ada Generation
+171%
15.82 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2016
Release Date
Mar 2023
Embedded
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1120 MHz
Base Clock
1110 MHz
1266 MHz
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s
Render Config
36
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
40
2304
Shading Units
5120
144
TMUs
160
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
160
-
RT Cores
40
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
40.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.88 GPixel/s
182.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
247.2 GTexel/s
5.834 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
15.82 TFLOPS
5.834 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.82 TFLOPS
364.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
247.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
95W
TDP
100W
-
-
-
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Ellesmere
GPU Name
AD104
Ellesmere XT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
5 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.4
Shader Model
6.7
