Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs AMD Radeon Pro W6500M

AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs AMD Radeon Pro W6500M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6500M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E9550 MXM 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro W6500M 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 61% (2040MHz vs 1266MHz)
Lower TDP (25W vs 95W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E9550 MXM +39%
5.834 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6500M
4.178 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2016
Release Date
Unknown
Embedded
Generation
Radeon Pro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

1120 MHz
Base Clock
1512 MHz
1266 MHz
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
36
Compute Units
16
2304
Shading Units
1024
144
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
16
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

40.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.28 GPixel/s
182.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
130.6 GTexel/s
5.834 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.356 TFLOPS
5.834 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.178 TFLOPS
364.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
261.1 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
Navi 24
Ellesmere XT
GPU Variant
Navi 24
GCN 4.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
6 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Board Design

95W
TDP
25W
-
Suggested PSU
-
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy