Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs ATI Radeon E2400

AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs ATI Radeon E2400

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM and 128MB VRAM Radeon E2400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E9550 MXM 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1266MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
2264 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon E2400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 95W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E9550 MXM +12054%
5.834 TFLOPS
Radeon E2400
0.048 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2016
Release Date
Jun 2007
Embedded
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-II

Clock Speeds

1120 MHz
Base Clock
-
1266 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
36
Compute Units
2
2304
Shading Units
40
144
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

40.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
182.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
5.834 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.834 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
48.00 GFLOPS
364.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
RV610
Ellesmere XT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
65 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
0.18 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
85 mm²

Board Design

95W
TDP
25W
-
Suggested PSU
-
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy