AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs ATI Mobility FireGL V5600
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM and 256MB VRAM Mobility FireGL V5600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon E9550 MXM 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1266MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2184 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon E9550 MXM
+4761%
5.834 TFLOPS
Mobility FireGL V5600
0.12 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2016
Release Date
May 2007
Embedded
Generation
Mobility FireGL
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1120 MHz
Base Clock
-
1266 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
36
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
120
144
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
40.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
182.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
5.834 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.834 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
120.0 GFLOPS
364.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
95W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Ellesmere
GPU Name
M76
Ellesmere XT
GPU Variant
M76 GL
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
65 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
