AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Max Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon E9550 MXM 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 22% (1266MHz vs 1035MHz)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 95W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon E9550 MXM
5.834 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Max Q
+108%
12.19 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2016
Release Date
Jan 2022
Embedded
Generation
GeForce 30 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1120 MHz
Base Clock
510 MHz
1266 MHz
Boost Clock
1035 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s
Render Config
36
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
46
2304
Shading Units
5888
144
TMUs
184
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
184
-
RT Cores
46
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
40.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
99.36 GPixel/s
182.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
190.4 GTexel/s
5.834 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.19 TFLOPS
5.834 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.19 TFLOPS
364.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
190.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
95W
TDP
80W
-
-
-
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Ellesmere
GPU Name
GA104
Ellesmere XT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Ampere
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
Samsung
14 nm
Process Size
8 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
