Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs NVIDIA GeForce MX150

AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs NVIDIA GeForce MX150

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E9550 MXM 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 21% (1532MHz vs 1266MHz)
Lower TDP (25W vs 95W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E9550 MXM +395%
5.834 TFLOPS
GeForce MX150
1.177 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2016
Release Date
May 2017
Embedded
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

1120 MHz
Base Clock
1469 MHz
1266 MHz
Boost Clock
1532 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
3
36
Compute Units
-
2304
Shading Units
384
144
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

40.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.51 GPixel/s
182.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.77 GTexel/s
5.834 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
18.38 GFLOPS
5.834 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1177 GFLOPS
364.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
36.77 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
GP108
Ellesmere XT
GPU Variant
GP108-650-A1 (N17S-G1-A1)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Pascal
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
Samsung
14 nm
Process Size
14 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²

Board Design

95W
TDP
25W
-
Suggested PSU
-
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy