AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs AMD FirePro W6170M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM and 2GB VRAM FirePro W6170M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon E9550 MXM 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1266MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon E9550 MXM
+195%
5.834 TFLOPS
FirePro W6170M
1.971 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2016
Release Date
Aug 2014
Embedded
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1120 MHz
Base Clock
-
1266 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
36
Compute Units
14
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
896
144
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
40.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.60 GPixel/s
182.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
61.60 GTexel/s
5.834 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.834 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.971 TFLOPS
364.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
123.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
95W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Ellesmere
GPU Name
Emerald
Ellesmere XT
GPU Variant
Emerald XT GL
(216-0857001)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5
