AMD Radeon E9172 MXM vs AMD Radeon R7 A260
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon E9172 MXM and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 A260 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon E9172 MXM 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 24% (1219MHz vs 980MHz)
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
128 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 A260 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (57.60GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon E9172 MXM
+65%
1.248 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 A260
0.752 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2017
Release Date
Jan 2014
Embedded
Generation
All-In-One
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1124 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
980 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.00GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s
Render Config
8
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
384
32
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.840 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.52 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
752.6 GFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
35W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Lexa
GPU Name
Topaz
E9170
GPU Variant
Topaz XT
(216-0858020)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
1.55 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
125 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5
