Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E9171 MCM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A

AMD Radeon E9171 MCM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon E9171 MCM and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E9171 MCM 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 86% (1219MHz vs 657MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 64.13GB/s)
Lower TDP (40W vs 55W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A 's Advantages
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E9171 MCM +23%
1.248 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 760A
1.009 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2017
Release Date
Mar 2014
Embedded
Generation
GeForce 700A
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1124 MHz
Base Clock
628 MHz
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
657 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1002 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
64.13GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
8
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
768
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.51 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
42.05 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1009 GFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
42.05 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
GK106
Lexa MCM Pro
GPU Variant
N14E-GL-A1
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Kepler
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²

Board Design

40W
TDP
55W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy