Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon 680M vs ATI Radeon HD 3300 IGP

AMD Radeon 680M vs ATI Radeon HD 3300 IGP

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Radeon 680M and 0System Shared VRAM Radeon HD 3300 IGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon 680M 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2200MHz
728 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon 680M +8347%
3.379 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 3300 IGP
0.04 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Aug 2008
Navi II IGP
Generation
TeraScale IGP
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
2
768
Shading Units
40
48
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

70.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
105.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
6.758 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.379 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
40.00 GFLOPS
211.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Rembrandt
GPU Name
RS780
-
GPU Variant
RS780D
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
-
6 nm
Process Size
65 nm
13.1 billion
Transistors
0.18 billion
208 mm²
Die Size
85 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Motherboard Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy