Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon 660M vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

AMD Radeon 660M vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

We compared a Integrated graphics card GPU: 0System Shared VRAM Radeon 660M and a Desktop platform GPU: 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon 660M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 56% (1900MHz vs 1219MHz)
Lower TDP (15W vs 35W)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
128 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon 660M +16%
1.459 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 2100
1.248 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Jun 2017
Rembrandt
Generation
Radeon Pro Polaris
Integrated
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
925 MHz
1900 MHz
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
2GB
System Shared
Memory Type
GDDR5
System Shared
Memory Bus
64bit
System Dependent
Bandwidth
48.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
6
Compute Units
8
384
Shading Units
512
24
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
45.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
2.918 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
1459 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
91.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Rembrandt
GPU Name
Lexa
-
GPU Variant
Lexa PRO GL
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
6 nm
Process Size
14 nm
13.1 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
210 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Board Design

15W
TDP
35W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy