Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon 550X 640SP vs ATI FireMV 2250

AMD Radeon 550X 640SP vs ATI FireMV 2250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon 550X 640SP and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon 550X 640SP 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1071MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.00GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 50W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2018
Release Date
Jan 2007
Polaris
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1019 MHz
Base Clock
-
1071 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.00GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
10
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
-
40
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

17.14 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
42.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
1371 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1371 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
85.68 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
RV516
Lexa PRO (215-0904018)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
R500
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
UMC
14 nm
Process Size
80 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
32W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0b 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy