AMD Radeon 530X Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce MX250
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon 530X Mobile and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 1% (1038MHz vs 1024MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.06GB/s vs 36.00GB/s)
Lower TDP (10W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon 530X Mobile
0.786 TFLOPS
GeForce MX250
+1%
0.797 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Radeon 530X Mobile
557
GeForce MX250
+93%
1079
Graphics Card
Apr 2017
Release Date
Unknown
Mobility Radeon
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4
Clock Speeds
730 MHz
Base Clock
937 MHz
1024 MHz
Boost Clock
1038 MHz
1125 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
36.00GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
3
384
Shading Units
384
24
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.192 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.61 GPixel/s
24.58 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.91 GTexel/s
786.4 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.46 GFLOPS
786.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
797.2 GFLOPS
49.15 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
24.91 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
10W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Polaris 24
GPU Name
GP108B
Polaris 24 XT
(216-0867030)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.55 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
125 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.3
Shader Model
6.4
