ATI Radeon 3000 IGP vs Intel GMA 3100
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Radeon 3000 IGP and 0System Shared VRAM GMA 3100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI Radeon 3000 IGP 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
40 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
May 2007
TeraScale IGP
Generation
GMA Graphics
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
FSB
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
-
4
TMUs
4
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
1.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
-
-
-
28.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
-
-
-
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
13W
-
-
-
Motherboard Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
RS780
GPU Name
Bearlake
RS780L
GPU Variant
Bearlake-G+ (G33)
TeraScale
Architecture
Generation 4.0
-
Foundry
Intel
65 nm
Process Size
90 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
Unknown
85 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
9.0c
3.3
OpenGL
2.0
1.0
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
3.0
