ATI Radeon 3000 IGP vs NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Radeon 3000 IGP and 0System Shared VRAM GeForce 320M Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
8 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon 3000 IGP
0.028 TFLOPS
GeForce 320M Mac Edition
+225%
0.091 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Apr 2010
TeraScale IGP
Generation
GeForce 300M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
4
40
Shading Units
48
4
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
1.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
28.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.20 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
23W
-
-
-
Motherboard Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
RS780
GPU Name
C89
RS780L
GPU Variant
MCP89
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
-
-
-
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
85 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.0
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
4.1
