NVIDIA Quadro VX 200 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20c
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro VX 200 and 5GB VRAM Tesla K20c to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro VX 200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)
NVIDIA Tesla K20c 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (5GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (208.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
2384 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro VX 200
0.252 TFLOPS
Tesla K20c
+1298%
3.524 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2008
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro VX
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
320bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
208.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
112
Shading Units
2496
56
TMUs
208
16
ROPs
40
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.71 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
146.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
252.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.524 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1175 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G92
GPU Name
GK110
-
GPU Variant
GK110-885-KA-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.5
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
