NVIDIA Quadro VX 200 vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro VX 200 and 4GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 4 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro VX 200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4 's Advantages
Released 12 years late
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
3472 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro VX 200
0.252 TFLOPS
GRID RTX T10 4
+3867%
9.999 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2008
Release Date
Jan 2020
Quadro VX
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
56
112
Shading Units
3584
56
TMUs
224
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.28 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
312.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.00 TFLOPS
252.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.999 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
312.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G92
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.8
