NVIDIA Quadro VX 200 vs NVIDIA GRID K340
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro VX 200 and 1024MB VRAM GRID K340 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro VX 200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K340 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
272 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro VX 200
0.252 TFLOPS
GRID K340
+190%
0.733 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2008
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro VX
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
112
Shading Units
384
56
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
64 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
25.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
-
-
-
252.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G92
GPU Name
GK107
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
