NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Max Q and 8GB VRAM Quadro M5000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1620MHz
Lower TDP (40W vs 100W)
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 112.1GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+10%
3.318 TFLOPS
Quadro M5000M
2.995 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+14%
3220
Quadro M5000M
2810
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+14%
1505
Quadro M5000M
1312
Blender
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+68%
463
Quadro M5000M
275
OctaneBench
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+16%
71
Quadro M5000M
61
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Aug 2015
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1200 MHz
Base Clock
-
1620 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1751 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
112.1GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
1536
64
TMUs
96
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
51.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
103.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.60 GTexel/s
6.636 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.318 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.995 TFLOPS
103.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
93.60 GFLOPS
Board Design
40W
TDP
100W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GM204
-
GPU Variant
N16E-Q5-A1
Turing
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
5.2
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
