NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Max Q and 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1620MHz
Lower TDP (40W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 112.1GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+54%
3.318 TFLOPS
Quadro M3000M
2.15 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+59%
3220
Quadro M3000M
2016
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+59%
1505
Quadro M3000M
941
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Aug 2015
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1200 MHz
Base Clock
-
1620 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1751 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
112.1GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
1024
64
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
51.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.60 GPixel/s
103.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.20 GTexel/s
6.636 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.318 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.150 TFLOPS
103.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
40W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GM204
-
GPU Variant
N16E-Q1-A1
Turing
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
5.2
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
