NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Max Q and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 110% (1620MHz vs 771MHz)
Lower TDP (40W vs 100W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5100M 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 112.1GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+40%
3.318 TFLOPS
Quadro K5100M
2.369 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+152%
3220
Quadro K5100M
1273
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+196%
1505
Quadro K5100M
507
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1200 MHz
Base Clock
771 MHz
1620 MHz
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1751 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
112.1GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
1536
64
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
51.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.67 GPixel/s
103.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
98.69 GTexel/s
6.636 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.318 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.369 TFLOPS
103.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
98.69 GFLOPS
Board Design
40W
TDP
100W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N15E-Q5-A2
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
