NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q vs NVIDIA GRID K340
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Max Q and 1024MB VRAM GRID K340 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1620MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.1GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (40W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+352%
3.318 TFLOPS
GRID K340
0.733 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1200 MHz
Base Clock
-
1620 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1751 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
112.1GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
51.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
103.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
6.636 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.318 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
103.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS
Board Design
40W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GK107
-
-
-
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
