NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T1000 Mobile and 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1455MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 67.20GB/s)
800 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 134W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro T1000 Mobile
+1033%
2.607 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4600
0.23 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Mar 2007
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1395 MHz
Base Clock
-
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
768MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
67.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
12
896
Shading Units
96
56
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
96 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
46.56 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
81.48 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
5.215 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.607 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
230.4 GFLOPS
81.48 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
134W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
G80
-
GPU Variant
G80-850-A2
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
90 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.0
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
