NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T1000 Mobile and 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 41% (2050MHz vs 1455MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
3200 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro T1000 Mobile
2.607 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+544%
16.79 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1395 MHz
Base Clock
1950 MHz
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
4096
56
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
46.56 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
262.4 GPixel/s
81.48 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
524.8 GTexel/s
5.215 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
33.59 TFLOPS
2.607 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.79 TFLOPS
81.48 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Turing
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
6 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
