NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 and 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 6% (1650MHz vs 1560MHz)
Lower TDP (50W vs 260W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive 's Advantages
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
3712 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
2.957 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 6000 Passive
+386%
14.38 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2020
Release Date
Aug 2018
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1395 MHz
Base Clock
1305 MHz
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
72
896
Shading Units
4608
56
TMUs
288
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
52.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
149.8 GPixel/s
92.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
449.3 GTexel/s
5.914 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
28.75 TFLOPS
2.957 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.38 TFLOPS
92.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
449.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
260W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117B
GPU Name
TU102
N19P-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Turing
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
